Who can help with my hobby?

Discussion in 'Software' started by bdelapp, Mar 21, 2011.

  1. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    I developed an intense interest in the past few years in free imaginative, theoretical thinking.

    Unfortunately, given the educational disciplines required are not in my area I require help from others in the form of critiques, contributions and advice.

    If anyone has any input or is interest in any or all of the following I would like to hear from you: ;)

    Ionic wind generators

    Super conductive metals and ceramics

    Electro-magnetic fields

    Power generators and multipliers constructed on the nano level

    Fluid dynamics and gravities effects on human physiology

    Just a fun hobby to keep me from catching old timers disease… :-D
     
  2. TimW

    TimW MajorGeeks Administrator - Jedi Malware Expert Staff Member

    I spent a little time making a wind machine using spare lawn mower parts and some pieces of sheet metal. :-D:-D
     
  3. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Hey Tim... have you ever built an ionic lifter?
     
  4. TimW

    TimW MajorGeeks Administrator - Jedi Malware Expert Staff Member

    No, will have to google that!! ;)
     
  5. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

  6. TimW

    TimW MajorGeeks Administrator - Jedi Malware Expert Staff Member

  7. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

  8. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

  9. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Think outside your time and your mind. ;)
    I can take no credit for the following as DARPA has long been pursuing this path with great success. :major
    So, if you read and absorb large quantities of information regarding the following categories, then allow it simmer slowly inside your mind and imagination, then I believe you will come to some of the same conclusions.
    Collectively I believe the correct combination and configuration of the following have the abilities to give a craft the ability to nullify the effects of gravity, achieve incredible speeds (possibly exceeding physics as we know it) and mind boggling maneuverability.

    Power generators and multipliers constructed on the nano level

    Super conductive metals and ceramics not requiring the extreme cold temperatures, which I believe have already been developed or the requirements circumvented by additional technologies.

    Ionic wind generators -

    Electro-magnetic fields

    Fluid dynamics and gravities effects on human physiology

    There are other sciences (plasma and mercury) which I believe have a relation and correlation, but I have yet to dream it into existence.
     
  10. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Don't be shy :wave ... the facts are that nothing was ever invented without making the requisate mistakes first. ;)
     
  11. Rikky

    Rikky Wile E. Coyote - One of a kind

    Nah there's no way in physics to nullify the effects of gravity other than to over power it with an opposite force,you can't cause an object to move mass.

    In old Newtonian way of describing gravity maybe but since relativity came our understanding of gravity has changed.The problem is gravvity shouldn't be though of as a force it's more like an effect,gravity warps space and time it isn't merley a force acting upon objects with mass.#

    For example if you dropped a hammer and fired a laser beam horizontally on the surface of the earth the hammer and the laser beam would both hit the earth at the same time,even though the photons in the laser beam have 0 mass.This is because both the hammer and the laser beam are travelling through the same gravitationally warped space.

    Figuring out why things have mass will be the first step in undertstanding how to overcome the effects of gravity.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
     
  12. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist


    Hey thanks Rikky for contributing your knowledge and imagination.

    Here is my train or thought.

    First and foremost, everyone knows the one main problem we've had is power generation on a small enough scale.


    #1 - The US, likely thru NASA in conjunction with DARPA and private contractors have been successfully flying and testing craft here in the SW for some time. It is unclear if these craft are completely ion lifters, could be a combination of that and lighter than air craft, or other possibilites.
    But the fact is, the giant flying wing is flying and exists.

    Pardon me, but I have been called away. I'll be back on later and lets talk again.
     
  13. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Hey Tim... as you answered my initial solicitation for people who might be interested in helping me expand my hobby, an interest outside the box which is physics, I want to make sure it is an acceptable subject for the Lounge.
    To inform of the depth of my commitment and interest, I have read thousands of pages over the past two years, consulted with dozens on the university level and above and written almost 500 (unpublished) pages myself.
    This point here being to emphasize the potential size of this thread, if Rikky and others hang in there.
    No harm no foul for me, I just want to make sure and not take up server space with off the subject conversations.
    Bruce :)
     
  14. Rikky

    Rikky Wile E. Coyote - One of a kind

    I don't know what craft you mean by the flying wing?Do you know of any evidence or articles describing their operation?

    The power supply problem is one being worked on all the time,IMO THE most likely new propulsion with come when stable fusion plasma can be maintained.We're probably about 20-30 years away from creating stable plasma's and hence creating a viable propulsion power source let alone putting one in a craft and flying it.To date no stable plasma has been created that lasts for more than a second and none of the fusion reaction experiments have produced any excess power that can be harnessed and it even may turn out to be impossible without the gravity of a star.

    There are ion thrusters being used by NASA ATM but the amount of thrust is minuscule albeit many times more energy efficient than chemical rockets but these don't work like ion lifters,ion lifters ionise the surrounding air to cause lift 'basically cooking it' so are useless to NASA as they don't work in a vacuum.Ion thrusters work in a vacuum and can use a nuclear power source to supply the power and are actually in use even by commercial satellites but they suffer the same problem as a chemical rocket in that they use gas as a fuel and once its run out so does the propulsion.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thruster

    EDIT any ion lifter that had the power to lift a vehicle or multiple vehicles would have to ionise so much air it would create pollution levels of ozone and damage the nitrogen and oxygen in our atmosphere.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2011
  15. DavidGP

    DavidGP MajorGeeks Forum Administrator - Grand Pooh-Bah Staff Member

    Noved into Gadgets and other Electronics as the topic deserves this type of forum area over just an interesting link as the conversation on gadgets is good from what I have read so far.

    I see Rikky is in his element ;)
     
  16. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Thanks for the info David... just wanted to make sure... hey Rikky... haven't forgotten you... just got called away on an important matter which I am still working on...
    But quickly, the 'wing' is just a rough shape and yes, there are thousands of people here who saw it and some quite good pictures if you can talk to the right people.
    I have spoken to people who the whole street came out and looked up at it less than 300 feet in the air, creeping slowly, possibly floating along, not a sound.
    But, gotta run again, I'll be back on later today.
    Go MG
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 23, 2011
  17. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    I babble on again... :-D

    I think everyone awaits every result to come from CERN, whose research has expedited targeted endeavors in Illinois, Texas and all the other labs.

    Could it be Pandora’s Box will be discovered?

    If not here at the many private research labs and secret bases to which we aren’t directly privy.

    I believe we see far more of the top scientists openly speaking of the likelihood of physics as we know it being at least redefined.

    I personally believe there is one discovery which will be made at CERN which will give us a new understanding of the big boom and the relationship of energy, mass and an explanation of gravity.

    New life has been pumped into electro-magnetic research which has shown under controlled lab conditions both living tissue and inanimate objects can be made to counteract gravity.

    The single most over whelming problem of propulsion system size appears to be in process of resolution. My research tells me that the development of chemical powered lasers had much to do with this discovery.

    I believe a workable system has been developed and tested which is on the horizon of revolutionizing and defying our imagination. And soon to be of a size which does not expend all of the energy generated, just to propel the generator.

    To this, I believe it could possibly use minor nuclear but more likely chemical and exotic materials (I call it exotic as I can obtain no information regarding its composition) which in turn will serve as the initial energy source, primary if you might. Then, when used in conjunction with power conserving and multiplying, super-conductive ceramic materials protected inside a super electro-magnetic protective exterior, the results push the limits of our imagination.

    Or course we know the laws of physics clearly show that the mass of an object increases as it moves closer to the speed of light. Given this we know it is impossible to reach the speed of light with our technologies and materials. But two thoughts come to mind here, one being a new material which has such low mass density it lacks the competition for energy of conventional materials, and the other possibly more importantly compels me to believe and suggest we don’t need to move at the speed of light. But that is another subject.


    Importantly I move to my observations beginning in the early 80’s and continuing through today. Particularly, in the past 8 years I have seen very distinctive and often repeated phrases developing a pattern of use by this group.

    The original announcements I saw regarding the new frontier of nano research and its impact on technology was stereotypical. Typically relating the value to day to day life via computers, batteries for electric cars, etc.

    BTW, isn’t this great subterfuge for dark projects?

    In the beginning such terms as ‘the new field of nano technology’ led a natural progression to what the ‘current research on the nano level has discovered’. At a point the reporting split into multiple camps, e.g. those focusing on the consumer products and those disappearing into the dark world of research.

    However, soon there were bits and pieces leaked by the dark side casually mentioning ‘now that we have reached the point of useful development and implementation’. Most recently I have heard top physicists and other scientist from the such schools as U of A, NYU, MIT and others speak slyly of ‘the continued development of new systems’ which we can ‘now utilize in reaching into the heavens’.

    An interesting note, when I correlate all my personal information with my observations, along side of the patents beginning in the early eighties to today, I find an interesting pattern.

    Subtle albeit it, but many of the ideas which had fallen from vogue in the science of physics and other sciences and once referred to openly as ‘parlor tricks if you will, have now been resuscitated.

    Have to run, back at it for a few hours and will be back on tomorrow.
     
  18. Rikky

    Rikky Wile E. Coyote - One of a kind

    Well I agree you it is good fuel for the imagination and you certainly do have a fertile imagination:-D And I mean this in the nicest possible non condescending way:)

    I'm more of a hard facts kind of person,what's possible,how its possible and mostly I like to see the numbers.

    I do think we're on the verge of a breakthrough in physics in particular mass and gravity,my personal non qualified 'belief' is that we're missing or have misunderstood something really important regarding gravity and its effect in the universe.there are couple of reasons that lead me to believe this;

    1.Gravity appears to be too weak when compared to the other fundamental forces and in the same vein gravity is the most powerful and destructive force in the universe.
    2.There isn't enough gravity/mass in the universe to hold galaxies together,this proven by the speed at which outer stars in galactic system rotate.
    3.The culmination of gravity's power is a black hole and these make no sense at all:-D
    4.Even though the universe has enough gravity to hold star systems and galaxies together the universe is still being pulled apart by an unkown force proven by hubble with red shifts.
    5.Our two main theories/observed effects quantum mechanics and relativity don't work together,its would appear on of them or both of them is wrong or we're missing something vital, String theory has unified these forces but to date is an unprovable theory adn it hasn't as yet been able to make any predictions.

    In each of these problems we've basically come up with a new particle or effect to compensate.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

    IMO and that's a very big IMO:-D I think all of these problems are related and the solution which may very well be very simple solution will be the biggest eureka moment in the history of science 'apart from TV's of course.' and if I let my imagination wander a little further I think the solution will be something that's right in front our noses and be something that we've quite simply misinterpreted or misunderstood for decades.

    An maybe when these problems or this one big problem as I like think of it have been figured out gravity will no longer be a problem to us any more and the universe will become our oyster.:)
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2011
  19. Rikky

    Rikky Wile E. Coyote - One of a kind

  20. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Rikky... I've read you post with GREAT interest and believe we're on the same page... but I just cut my left middle finger badly making a sandwich and I'm one hand typing. I'll throw some more at ya tomorrow after my finger stops bleeding... lol
     
  21. bdelapp

    bdelapp Specialist

    Rikky… I appreciate and take no harm or foul from what you said, and as a matter of fact I consider it a compliment as ‘fertile means the ability to grow’.

    I applaud the following statement as you hit the nail on the head.

    “IMO and that's a very big IMO, I think all of these problems are related and the solution which may very well be a very simple solution will be the biggest eureka moment in the history of science 'apart from TV's of course.' and if I let my imagination wander a little further I think the solution will be something that's right in front our noses and be something that we've quite simply misinterpreted or misunderstood for decades.”

    To this, IMHO I suggest ‘we know so little and yet we assume we know so much.’ FYI, I am currently contributing to a book a friend is writing titled, “What We Think We Know”.

    Also I believe your comment “misinterpreted or misunderstood” is spot on and the world will soon see the origins of ‘the beginning’ were misunderstood.

    I’ve followed Hawking (and his opponents) since his original conception of a ‘Theory of Everything’.

    “I do think we're on the verge of a breakthrough in physics in particular mass and gravity, my personal non qualified 'belief' is that we're missing or have misunderstood something really important regarding gravity and its effect in the universe. There are a couple of reasons that lead me to believe this;

    BTW… You are in great company in your following opines as my favorite of all is M. Kaku and he is in total agreement.

    1. Gravity appears to be too weak when compared to the other fundamental forces and in the same vein gravity is the most powerful and destructive force in the universe.

    IMO, I don’t believe that gravity alone is the culprit of destruction. I don’t see gravity in itself as a critical force unless the force from object A, the larger of A and B is increased exponentailly in its density.
    This sort of increase in the density would also increase the electro-magnetic output/forces and the force of whether we consider gravity to be attractive or repulsive in nature.
    By varying the equation by the space and time between objects A and B and factoring in whether there is another larger object C exerting any force on object B I think we measure the affect of gravity?

    2. There isn't enough gravity/mass in the universe to hold galaxies together, this proven by the speed at which outer stars in our galactic system rotate.

    Include the speed at which the universe is expanding. I think this is the point to mention that most believe now that gravity is more a pushing or repelling force (possibly from dark matter or anti-matter?) rather than a pulling or attractive?


    3. The culmination of gravity's power is a black hole and these make no sense at all

    If we believe in membranes/planes/dimensions, then wouldn’t one assume there must be a balance in the sum total of energy/mass in all dimensions and each based on the available space created by the expansion rate of each galaxy?

    Constantly spewing (big bang) and sucking (black holes) energy/matter inter-dimensionally between all?
    It’s a little like recycling I suppose.

    4. Even though the universe has enough gravity to hold star systems and galaxies together the universe is still being pulled apart by an unknown force proven by Hubble with red shifts.

    So could this be dark matter, which as the caboose of the ‘big bang’ train is left behind by specific quantum relationship and due to less energy is moving more slowly outward adding a bit of a push to objects.

    5.Our two main theories/observed effects quantum mechanics and relativity don't work together, it would appear one of them or both of them is wrong or we're missing something vital, String theory has unified these forces but to date is an improvable theory and it hasn't as yet been able to make any predictions.”

    The quantum relationship and the electrical connection between atoms, electrons or any particles whatever may have all to do with the force of gravity, e.g. as simple as the force of gravity = the mass increased by density, somehow including space and time?

    OK dude... some rhetorical, some honest questions/comments but all fuel for the fire of the imagination.

    If and when I begin to bore you, just say so as I am a no harm no foul person.

    Anyway, my mind is tiring and I have to finish the recovery on my grandkids el cheapo laptop before supper.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2011

MajorGeeks.Com Menu

Downloads All In One Tweaks \ Android \ Anti-Malware \ Anti-Virus \ Appearance \ Backup \ Browsers \ CD\DVD\Blu-Ray \ Covert Ops \ Drive Utilities \ Drivers \ Graphics \ Internet Tools \ Multimedia \ Networking \ Office Tools \ PC Games \ System Tools \ Mac/Apple/Ipad Downloads

Other News: Top Downloads \ News (Tech) \ Off Base (Other Websites News) \ Way Off Base (Offbeat Stories and Pics)

Social: Facebook \ YouTube \ Twitter \ Tumblr \ Pintrest \ RSS Feeds