Depp V. Heard

i'm shocked there's no depp-heard thread here -- was there some prohibition against the subject?

anyway, my contribution is simply to point out that the autogen chyron was running about 3-to-1 "johnny debt" over "johnny death" today. x/c for that one time his name was rendered "jaundice".

hers was consistently "amber hurd". figured we get an "ambulance" or "ampersand" in there somewhere, but i didn't catch one.

and no, i have never been asked to "judge ass karate" before!

just for the record.

 

Yeh there is.....no one gives a rats!

 

$10,000,000 in compensation?

Oh, that's a sore one.

 

shocking news!

 

Really?

I can post a list of shocking news and Depp vs. Heard is not on it...

 

Was wondering why the thread was made today in particular, hence I did a quick google search and discovered this!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/unsea...-defamation-trial-contain-shocking-new-claims

Very shocking indeed!!

I feel that women are prejudiced in general, to the point that even incomplete recordings taken by Johnny Depp did not raise concerns about plausible tampering of evidence.

 

Many forums ban political debates due to problems with flaming. Not sure about MG though, but i assume so cos i’m shocked there’s no political threads - a lot been going on lately!!

 

depp v heard is a political thread? huh?

and the thread wasn't made "today in particular" -- it's 2 months old!

 

Remember Lads......we are a computer geek forum!
Poor old Johnny does not figure here.
Neither Politics!

 

what is this, the red herring show? 3 posts in a row about politic threads...which this ISN'T.

hijack city!

 

huh?

 

* fears Laura’s ban hammer *

 

huh

 

lmao.....I shall never judge another member by their avatar alone!

 

i'm completely lost. we all know what the lounge is about, but why are there like 12 posts in a row about it IN THIS THREAD?

not one but FOUR of u are now making cracks about this thread being killed off for...political content?

combined with 2-3 nonsequitur posts...i say it again: huh?

 

It is an interesting story.
A little more than politics...
Ben & Camille Shot Down Elaine's Arguments in UNSEALED Motions

s.x

 

No need to take that tone, a little respect goes a long way ;-) I realise I am being annoying sorry - we can all be annoying at times though

I am gonna take on the tone of @Major Attitude - one response to this and you’re gone for good :-D

As to not derail this thread, here endeth my hyperactivity-fuelled rant

 

This thread is past it's "Read by Date."

 

Eldon Eldon Eldon
Zumba Zumba Zumba

 

cheeky3 and i are diff users! i had ONE "huh" at that point, and it was AFTER your post about lounge purpose.

cheeky3 has had ONE "huh" total, afaict. not sure where "repeated" comes in.

i get that if either of us KEPT DOING SO it would be annoying, but neither of us did! 3 "huh"s, total, in response to 8-9 nonsequiturs seems pretty conservative to me!

-----
back on topic, any truth to the rumor that they're getting back together?

 

I don’t see it sorry. I only have ONE account here. My shenanigans were in relation to something else, not this thread.

Also idk if it’s me, but i find it rude to just say “huh” without context. Therefore i imitated @K Faraday as banter

 

Also i am female. Me thinks this thread is looking to be closed. I will refrain from going off-topic in future, I just couldn’t resist this time

 

Should I take that last sentence as a warning to tone it down?

I wish to remain welcome here and hope I’m not getting complacement

I am aware you as an admin have that right too, the joke was in reference to other threads where he flipped out at a member and said that a response would result in an insta ban lmao

 

“Not really a difficult thing to do”
I smell a rat - was there a tone?

 

do as u will, but pls don't accuse us of stuff we aren't doing! cheeky3 only had **one** huh post, afaict, and my second one was AFTER your reference point!

if u wish to say "you are both being obnoxious saying 'huh' ONCE apiece", fine. but pls. stop saying "multiple huhs".

i am not a troublemaker -- u will notice all the snarky posts are coming from the OTHER user -- but i do get confused fending off false accusations....

 

Reason I’m snarky is cos my cheekiness fuelled admins elsewhere and I got banned for THEIR snarkiness

Here endeth my sugar-fuelled activity.

Ta

 

Ah well your either part of our crew, or your not!

Lucky Im not a Mod......I would banish you.
You smell of trouble.

 

i actually came to her defense, only to have her then turn on...ME!!

hmmm. i kinda like that in a girl. u single, cheeky?

 

Hey I never turned on you, it was @TimW who did assuming we’re the same person. I was just teasing you for your tone.

I’ll no longer be posting in this thread so please feel free to continue with the topic at hand

 

We are a band of digital tech geeks who advise/help those in need, thats basically it in a nutshell.

There is not much room for online aggravation through any means such as personal beliefs or Individual platform's/agenda's.

Stick to Social Media for this.

 

I didn’t mean it as online aggravation. I was just having banter.

@TimW I promise to begone, please can my discouragement be lifted?