Optimizing Adaptive Huffman Codes For Performance

Discussion in 'Software' started by HarryPotter, Oct 26, 2020.

  1. HarryPotter

    HarryPotter MajorGeek

    Hi! I am using Adaptive Huffman codes for my compression technique. However, when I compress an uncompressable file, I get results too bad to be true. I expect something like 102-105% but get 125%. Is this the nature of the technique? I am using the Vitter technique and my own ways to shorten NYTs. Is there anything else I can do to optimize the technique?
     
    HarryPotter, Oct 26, 2020
    #1

MajorGeeks.Com Menu

Downloads All In One Tweaks \ Android \ Anti-Malware \ Anti-Virus \ Appearance \ Backup \ Browsers \ CD\DVD\Blu-Ray \ Covert Ops \ Drive Utilities \ Drivers \ Graphics \ Internet Tools \ Multimedia \ Networking \ Office Tools \ PC Games \ System Tools \ Mac/Apple/Ipad Downloads

Other News: Top Downloads \ News (Tech) \ Off Base (Other Websites News) \ Way Off Base (Offbeat Stories and Pics)

Social: Facebook \ YouTube \ Twitter \ Tumblr \ Pintrest \ RSS Feeds