Test Your Pc.

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Anon-469e6fb48c, Jul 11, 2018.

  1. Anon-469e6fb48c

    Anon-469e6fb48c Anonymized

  2. satrow

    satrow Major Geek Extraordinaire

    Netbook:
    UserBenchmarks (older test):
    CPU: Intel Atom N270 - 4.5%
    SSD: Crucial M4 128GB - 24.3%
    RAM: Unknown 1x2GB - 8.6%
    MBD: Samsung NC10

    Main PC (older test):
    UserBenchmarks: Game 68%, Desk 68%, Work 51%
    CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 - 67.6%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB - 73.3%
    SSD: Plextor M5M mSATA 256GB - 66.7%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 250GB - 99.3%
    SSD: Samsung 840 250GB - 73.6%
    HDD: Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB - 38.4%
    HDD: Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB - 58.9%
    RAM: G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB - 60.3%
    MBD: Asrock Z77E-ITX

    Backup PC (fresh test):
    UserBenchmarks: Game 51%, Desk 55%, Work 30%
    CPU: Intel Core i3-3220 - 51%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 970 - 62.9%
    SSD: Crucial MX300 525GB - 83.1%
    SSD: Crucial BX100 250GB - 65.5%
    HDD: Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB - 35.1%
    HDD: Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB - 22.3%
    RAM: Samsung M379B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GB - 61.1%
    MBD: Asrock B75M-ITX
     
  3. Just Playin

    Just Playin MajorGeek

    Gaming 47% Desktop 89% Workstation 54%
    Motherboard Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
    Memory 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
    Display 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
    OS Windows 10
    BIOS Date 20160919
    Uptime 5.6 Days
    Run Date Jul 11 '18 at 17:44
    Run Duration 269 Seconds
    Run User USA-User
    Background CPU 2%
     
  4. Anon-469e6fb48c

    Anon-469e6fb48c Anonymized

    I bought the 240 gig Kingston suv400s37 for the lack of speed.For my laptop.If you look at the specs on it the speed is pretty high compared to some.Baseline performance data transfer (at to) 960GB – up to 540MB/s read and 500MB/s write.
     
  5. DavidGP

    DavidGP MajorGeeks Forum Administrator - Grand Pooh-Bah Staff Member

    Desktop gets this

    UserBenchmarks: Game 44%, Desk 86%, Work 61%
    CPU: Intel Core i7-7700 - 85.5%
    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti - 39.3%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 500GB - 107.2%
    SSD: Samsung 840 Evo 120GB - 88%
    SSD: OCZ Vertex 4 256GB - 95.5%
    HDD: WD Green 2TB (2009) - 51.8%
    HDD: WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB - 41.7%
    RAM: Corsair CM4X8GC3000C15K4 2x8GB - 84.6%
    MBD: Asus PRIME H270-PRO

    Reading through some of the detailed info I need to work out why the SSDs and RAM are flagged as underperforming, likely I've not set options correct in BIOS.
     
  6. satrow

    satrow Major Geek Extraordinaire

    [The vanilla 840 has an issue verified by checking the graph output from HDTune, I don't think it applies to the EVO version David, link me to your stats and I'll try to interpret further?]

    My hardware is mostly stock or undervolted/underclocked (cool'n'quiet) + my Plextor mSATA SSD is onboard hooked to a SATA II lane, only a few later revisions of Ivy 'boards had full fat mSATA. On my backup rig, there's only 1 SATA III port.
     
    DavidGP likes this.
  7. DavidGP

    DavidGP MajorGeeks Forum Administrator - Grand Pooh-Bah Staff Member

    Cheers Satrow
    Ran it again and here is (hopefully) link
    www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/9690170

    Yeah not tweaked mine at all at default settings for cool n quiet with mobo determined O/C it does hit 4.1ghz on occasion depending on task.
     
    satrow likes this.
  8. satrow

    satrow Major Geek Extraordinaire

    Everything is fine except for the RAM David, though the 850 looks a little low (check TRIM's Active with HDSentinel? but maybe W10 or some user software was hitting the I/O during the test with random logging, etc.), look at the 'spike' charts left side, yours are almost all well above the 50th percentile mark.

    I'd set the RAM to use XMP 2.0 + Dual Channel (as suggested there) and tweak the XMP 2.0 figures to match those supplied by the memory makers (CAS 15-17-17-35 ?) and 1T, see if that sticks and test again (assuming your BIOS/'board has XMP 2.0, otherwise use XMP).
     
    DavidGP likes this.
  9. satrow

    satrow Major Geek Extraordinaire

    Out of time, Edit lost :(

    Your RAM issue is that you're on the default speed of 2400GHz, most users, esp. gamers who are most likely to make use of sites like these, will have theirs set to the advertised 3000GHz @ 1.35v, which would also imply that your voltage could probably be reduced to the 1.25 - 1.28v range and reduce overall Wattage/consumption by ~4W or more.

    Frankly, I'd put more effort into reducing Writes on the 850 EVO :)

    Do you have your swap files split over all SSDs? I use 3x 1GB fixed w/16BG here, my own usage/checks show that I rarely approach the max. allocation, exc. for very rare occasions when a site with a big memory leak is held open too long, eg. overnight. Windows should give the swap file writes to the first drive that responds, which would often be the non-System drives, as the System drive is normally the busiest by far.
     
    DavidGP likes this.
  10. DavidGP

    DavidGP MajorGeeks Forum Administrator - Grand Pooh-Bah Staff Member

    Cheers satrow, I have printed those two posts out to review later on.
    Good thought on swap file as normally dont but I had this PC custom built, so now cannot remember if I have done my normal tweaks (lazy ass me), would never have these days a swap file on a HDD, which is why one of the smaller secondary SSDs I would put a fixed SF on that. Will look at the RAM timings for sure.
     
    satrow likes this.
  11. Anon-469e6fb48c

    Anon-469e6fb48c Anonymized

    See nice thing about that site is.You can find what your bottleneck is.
     
  12. StruldBrug

    StruldBrug Sergeant

    This sux!
    UserBenchmarks: Game 12%, Desk 38%, Work 17%
    CPU: Intel Core i3-2120 - 48.1%
    GPU: Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) - 1.3%
    HDD: Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB - 32.6%
    RAM: Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB - 48.8%
    MBD: Asus ET2410
     
  13. the mekanic

    the mekanic Major Mekanical Geek

    Looks like the results are skewed due to Samsung's Magician. Rapid Mode can't be measured with this benchmark tool.

    Benchmark without:

    UserBenchmarks: Game 63%, Desk 62%, Work 52%
    CPU: AMD FX-8350 - 60.6%
    GPU: AMD R9 390 - 68.1%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Pro 512GB - 92.7%
    HDD: WD Green 1TB (2010) - 48%
    HDD: WD Gold 1TB (2016) - 91.8%
    RAM: Crucial BL51264FN186H.Y16F 4x4GB - 54.2%
    MBD: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0


    Benchmark with:

    UserBenchmarks: Game 59%, Desk 48%, Work 43%
    CPU: AMD FX-8350 - 60.1%
    GPU: AMD R9 390 - 67%
    SSD: Samsung 850 Pro 512GB - 379.1%
    HDD: WD Green 1TB (2010) - 37.5%
    HDD: WD Gold 1TB (2016) - 93.1%
    RAM: Crucial BL51264FN186H.Y16F 4x4GB - 52.8%
    MBD: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0
     
  14. Imandy Mann

    Imandy Mann MajorGeekolicious

    Don't feel so bad.
    This lowly stock Acer 603 made it to only-
    11%, 21%, 14%
    J1900 cpu so I didn't expect much.
    Still does all I ask it to though!
     

MajorGeeks.Com Menu

Downloads All In One Tweaks \ Android \ Anti-Malware \ Anti-Virus \ Appearance \ Backup \ Browsers \ CD\DVD\Blu-Ray \ Covert Ops \ Drive Utilities \ Drivers \ Graphics \ Internet Tools \ Multimedia \ Networking \ Office Tools \ PC Games \ System Tools \ Mac/Apple/Ipad Downloads

Other News: Top Downloads \ News (Tech) \ Off Base (Other Websites News) \ Way Off Base (Offbeat Stories and Pics)

Social: Facebook \ YouTube \ Twitter \ Tumblr \ Pintrest \ RSS Feeds