What DDR2 Speed?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by crazylegs, Jul 31, 2006.

  1. crazylegs

    crazylegs Private E-2

    Building yet another rig for a family member and I have a question about RAM. The board is a Biostar TForce-6100 AM2 microATX that supports DDR2 800. The processor is an AM2 Athlon 3800 AM2 single core. I'm trying to keep the price down and the DDR2 800 is pretty darned pricey and I don't think it's really needed. What would be a good memory speed that would satisfy the board/CPU without breaking the bank yet still have good performance? Thanks gang.
    Crazylegs
     
  2. rogvalcox

    rogvalcox MajorGeek

    Your motherboard can accommodate up to 4GB of DDR-2 400/533/667/800 memory...so therefore the 400 will be the bottom end.

    http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp?Recs=10&Nav=|c:1554|c:1716|&Sort=0

    Roger
     
  3. crazylegs

    crazylegs Private E-2

    Thanks Rogvalcox, I understand that. Where I'm ignorant is how to match the speed to the CPU to get the best bang for the buck. The K7s,754s and 939s were pretty simple to match the memory to the FSB MHZ. But on these, the numbers just don't make sense. I've been everywhere for an explanation on how to do it but to no avail. Can you give me a fast crash course on the AM2/DDR2 relationship? In other words, on the older chips, you could, for instance use DDR 400 instead of the DDR 333 (side bus of 333 MHz on the CPU, just as an example) but the best bang for the buck would be to use DDR 333. I'm not seeing how that works with the AM2 chip and the DDR2 memory. Thanks.
    Crazylegs
     
  4. rogvalcox

    rogvalcox MajorGeek

    As usual your memory will be slower than the FSB, but typically the L1 and L2 cache will help buffer the bottleneck/lag. Ofcourse you will get closer to the bus speed if you get the DDR2 800, but if you go with the 400 you will still have adequate performance, and will still be running faster than if you had a system that was running, say, an XP 3000 with 400 mhz of standard ddr1 400. Technically speaking, that is. I personally haven't had the honors to work with AM@ and DDR2, but that is just what I've read here and there and combining that with the hardware logic/knowledge that I have stored in that thick skull of mine!!

    Again...It also depends on what you are doing with this system too!! If you are running Adobe Photoshop, then you will see a more significance in performance ratios in relation to hardware specs, as opposed to if you are just googling recipes, or reading e-mails!!

    Roger
     
  5. crazylegs

    crazylegs Private E-2

    Rogvalcox, thanks.
    Crazylegs
     

MajorGeeks.Com Menu

Downloads All In One Tweaks \ Android \ Anti-Malware \ Anti-Virus \ Appearance \ Backup \ Browsers \ CD\DVD\Blu-Ray \ Covert Ops \ Drive Utilities \ Drivers \ Graphics \ Internet Tools \ Multimedia \ Networking \ Office Tools \ PC Games \ System Tools \ Mac/Apple/Ipad Downloads

Other News: Top Downloads \ News (Tech) \ Off Base (Other Websites News) \ Way Off Base (Offbeat Stories and Pics)

Social: Facebook \ YouTube \ Twitter \ Tumblr \ Pintrest \ RSS Feeds