bin ladens speech

Full transcript of bin Ladin's speech

Monday 01 November 2004, 16:01 Makka Time, 13:01 GMT

Bin Ladin directed his message at the American people
Related:
Bin Ladin muscles into US election race
Bush, Kerry vow to defeat bin Ladin
Excerpts from Usama bin Ladin's speech
Bin Ladin: Reasons to attack remain

Bin Ladin tape
Tools:
Email Article
Print Article
Send Your Feedback

Following is the full English transcript of Usama bin Ladin's speech in a videotape sent to Aljazeera. In the interests of authenticity the transcript, which appeared as subtitles at the foot of the screen, has been left unedited.

Praise be to Allah who created the creation for his worship and commanded them to be just and permitted the wronged one to retaliate against the oppressor in kind. To proceed:

Peace be upon he who follows the guidance: People of America this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes and results.

Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example – Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 – may Allah have mercy on them.

No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.

No-one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again.

But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.

So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider.

I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorized and displaced.

I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.

The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.

In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.

This means the oppressing and embargoing to death of millions as Bush Sr. did in Iraq in the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known, and it means the throwing of millions of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of children – also in Iraq – as Bush Jr. Did, in order to remove an old agent and replace him with a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's oil and other outrages.

So with these images and their like as their background, the events of September 11th came as a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be blamed for defending his sanctuary?

Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such, then it is unavoidable for us.

This is the message which I sought to communicate to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years before September 11th.

And you can read this, if you wish, in my interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting with John Weiner in 1998.

You can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya and Tanzania and in Aden. And you can read it in my interview with Abdul Bari Atwan, as well as my interviews with Robert Fisk.

The latter is one of your compatriots and co-religionists and I consider him to be neutral. So are the pretenders of freedom at The White House and the channels controlled by them able to run an interview with him? So that he may relay to the American people what he has understood from us to be the reasons for our fight against you?

If you were to avoid these reasons, you will have taken the correct path that will lead America to the security that it was in before September 11th. This concerned the causes of the war.

As for it's results, they have been, by the grace of Allah, positive and enormous, and have, by all standards, exceeded all expectations. This is due to many factors, chief amongst them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents.

Our experience with them is lengthy, and both types are replete with those who are characterized by pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of wealth. This resemblance began after the visits of Bush Sr. to the region.

At a time when some of our compatriots were dazzled by America and hoping that these visits would have an effect on our countries, all of a sudden he was affected by those monarchies and military regimes, and became envious of their remaining decades in their positions, to embezzle the public wealth of the nation without supervision or accounting.

So he took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to his son and they named it the Patriot Act, under the pretense of fighting terrorism. In addition, Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state governors, and didn't forget to import expertise in election fraud from the region's presidents to Florida to be made use of in moments of difficulty.

All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration. All that we have to do is to send two Mujahideen to the furthest point East to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies.

This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside the Mujahideen, bled Russia for ten years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat.

All Praise is due to Allah.

So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.

That being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won against the administration in the White House or that the administration has lost in this war have not been precise, because when one scrutinizes the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.

Rather, the policy of the White House that demands the opening of war fronts to keep busy their various corporations – whether they be working in the field of arms or oil or reconstruction – has helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.

And so it has appeared to some analysts and diplomats that the White House and us are playing as one team towards the economic goals of the United States, even if the intentions differ.

And it was to these sorts of notions and their like that the British diplomat and others were referring in their lectures at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. (When they pointed out that) for example, al-Qaida spent $500 000 on the event, while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost – according to the lowest estimate – more than 500 billion dollars.

Meaning that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs.

As for the size of the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

And even more dangerous and bitter for America is that the Mujahideen recently forced Bush to resort to emergency funds to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the success of the blee-until-bankruptcy plan – with Allah's permission.

It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Haliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is...you.

It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within twenty minutes, before Bush and his administration notice.

It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would abandon 50 000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone, the time when they most needed him.

But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers. We were given three times the period required to execute the operations – All Praise is Due to Allah.

And it's no secret to you that the thinkers and perceptive ones from among the Americans warned Bush before the war and told him, "All that you want for securing America and removing the weapons of mass destruction – assuming they exist – is available to you, and the nations of the world are with you in the inspections, and it is in the interest of America that it not be thrust into an unjustified war with an unknown outcome."

But the darkness of the black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.

So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future. He fits the saying, "Like the naughty she-goat who used her hoof to dig up a knife from under the earth"

So I say to you, over 15 000 of our people have been killed and tens of thousands injured, while more than a thousand of you have been killed and more than 10 000 injured. And Bush's hands are stained with the blood of all those killed from both sides, all for the sake of oil and keeping their private companies in business.

Be aware that it is the nation who punishes the weak man when he causes the killing of one of its citizens for money, while letting the powerful one get off, when he causes the killing of more than 1000 of its sons, also for money.

And the same goes for your allies in Palestine. They terrorize the women and children, and kill and capture the men as they lie sleeping with their families on the mattresses, that you may recall that for every action, there is a reaction.

Finally, it behooves you to reflect on the last wills and testaments of the thousands who left you on the 11th as they gestured in despair. They are important testaments, which should be studied and researched.

Among the most important of what I read in them was some prose in their gestures before the collapse, where they say, "How mistaken we were to have allowed the White House to implement its aggressive foreign policies against the weak without supervision." It is as if they were telling you, the people of America, "Hold to account those who have caused us to be killed, and happy is he who learns from others' mistakes," And among that which I read in their gestures is a verse of poetry, "Injustice chases its people, and how unhealthy the bed of tyranny."

As has been said, "An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure."

And know that, "It is better to return to the truth than persist in error." And that the wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth and children for the sake of the liar in the White House.

In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida.
No.

Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security.

And Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have no Guardian or Helper. All Peace be Upon he who follows the Guidance.

 

Bin Laden needs to hire an American speech writer. It's too easy to poke holes through a lot of his statements.

 

I'd rather someone would poke some holes through him!

 

That's what happens when you are driven by religion beyond faith. "god" becomes a permit. The man is insane.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/11/01/binladen.tape/index.html

i find it rather interesting that what the bush administration is doing is exactly what bin laden wants

 

LOL. What Bin Laden WANTS is for us to pull in our claws and leave him alone. Ever read Uncle Remus & Brer Rabbit?

 

What Bin Laden wants is to spread his Wahabbist creed over the entire world. When the Klan burns a cross in a black man's yard, would you ask him what he did wrong? When skinheads attack a Jewish man, do you offer suggestions on what he should do to avoid angering skinheads in the future?

 

points are mute because our country is severely in debt and that debt will only increase now that bush is still president. who knows what will happen if it continues to increase, we can't sustain the current debt forever, something has to give.

 

So instead, lets sit back and let terrorists walk all over us and kill our people, and others as well in different countries.

Makes much more sense and is cheaper.

 

i never said that ... there are other ways to fight them ... like for instance actually hunting bin laden instead of trolloping the globe occupying countries whose only crime was to have a dictator who looked at us funny

 

You are just bitter that Kerry was trounced in the election.

Everyone is a critic.

Why don't you run for pres next round?

 

You can't be serious? You think Saddam's only crime was making funny faces?

 

what did he ever do to us? granted saddam isn't a nice guy(to put it mildly) and maybe after we catch bin laden and put an end to al queda then would be a time to fix the other problems in the middle east but that is not the case

 

Well, apparently the majority of voters in the US disagree with you, because he was just re-elected.

 

Well, personally, I feel we, as a country (heck, as humans!), have a responsibility to put an end to genocide wherever it is happening. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/27000.htm Hopefully, we can get the ball rolling in Sudan before too long as well.

 

wow, I am surprised that in 99% of the conversations about the war and why we're in Iraq that one of the main reasons we want Iraq to be a democracy and thus allies with the US is purely strategic in a military sense. Look at where Iraq is located. Bordering all muslim nations and has a nice big port in the persian gulf . If we could establish Iraq as a point of distribution of force, it would be cheaper ..MUCH cheaper than what it's costed AND we'll have a centralized point of operations with plenty of fuel right there.
IF it works out, we'll be their backyard permanently and have free rights to roam.

 

I thought we had bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuaite (sp)?

With all that we did for Iraq, I'm for running an oil pipeline directly from Iraq to mainland US

 

Iraq has more land inland and central than any other.

 

Actually that's false. The majority of people who claimed that Iraq was the determining factor in who they voted for ended up voting for Kerry.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5297118/

 

And that, right there, is the statement to end all arguments. I absolutely agree. We shouldn't sit idly while others are going through hell.

 

Read my statemenet again.

I didn't say the majority if Kerry voters thought that.

 

Ugh...Well, allow me to say it again.

In the exit polls, people were asked to pick between taxes, education, iraq, economy, terrorism, moral values, and health care to decide which one mattered to them most. The majority of voters who went into the voting booth with the whole ordeal in Iraq on their mind, ended up voting for Kerry. That doesn't mean the majority overall voted for Kerry...I'm just saying that the majority of people who held the situation in Iraq as a top priority ended up voting for Kerry.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5297138/ Scroll about half way down. You can read it for yourself.

 

yes ... the atrocities saddam has done were atrocious(most of them done while we were friends with saddam BTW ... so we in effect approved of them) ... but it is not our job to play the worlds police officer ... should we invade n. korea? china? how we would go about doing so? imagine the bloodbath that would entail in such an endeavor

at any rate the people of iraq are not free ... they are now ruled by a puppet gov't, who is more interested in bush' oil plunder than the interests of the iraqi people .... plus liberating iraq wasn't the reason we went to war in the first place, we went to war over mythical weapons of mass destruction

and about the majority ... the majority of people used to think the world was flat


(on a side note, it's nice to debate this w/o everyone screaming insults at each other, as happens so often in other forums)

 

Interesting set of choices. Both "Iraq" and "terrorism". One narrow focus, one broad focus.

And it appears those focused only on Iraq were Democrats. Kerry has been focusing almost exclusively on Iraq, and on "Bin Laden" by name, and ignoring the larger problem, larger threat, larger issue. Worrying about the broader picture, terrorism and the war on terror overall seems to be a Republican concern. Kerry is/was short-sighted. Which is likely one of the reasons he lost.