Diskkeeper Pro Ed Defrag program

Discussion in 'Software' started by Moni, Nov 22, 2004.

  1. Moni

    Moni Private E-2

    :rolleyes: I was wondering if any member is using the above product by Executive Software? I have been as my trusted techie refrerred me to it as he uses it. At the time though I did my :rolleyes: defrag with windows "xp" program it took a lot of time to do even though I tended to it on a fairly regular basis.
    I noticed a post by another person in another forum experiencing somewhat the same problem with their use of the program, a lot of fragments accumulating in a short period of time, but a lot faster defragging these than the windows "xp" defrag.
    There was also a suggestion in the other forum to use Page Defrag from Sysinternals Freeware but it was noted that this program is listed as compatible with NT and 2000 only. Has any member any experience with this program??? Diskkeeper?? Thankyou
     
  2. MellowMan

    MellowMan First Sergeant

    diskeeper is a good defrag program, very fast, but not necessarily the best.
    IMO pefectdisk or O&O are better, pefect disk, lays out the files on the disk in a more logical manner and plus it strategically places startup files, so windows will boot up faster.
    I use O&O tho because it lets you alphabetically order all your files (by folders) on your hardrive witch really speeds up disk operations, because all folder contents are next to each other on the hardrive-it just makes things alot more responsive (including boot up).
    If you get diskeeper you won't be disapointed, but I would recommend perfectdisk or O&O over diskeeper.

    good luck.
     
  3. fiver22

    fiver22 Sergeant

    I use Diskeeper Pro -and love it -unfortunately my only experience with defraggers lies with windows (blech) and Diskeeper (yay) ...I can't comment on any others...
    I have heard others using O&O -but have no personal experience with it.
    I don't think you'll do badly with Diskeeper -but I honestly cant comment on whether O&O or Diskeeper is better: I can say this: Diskeeper is WAY better than Windows defragger.
    Yours,
    522.
     
  4. herojig

    herojig Private E-2

    hi all, this is my first post here at mgeeks, and this looks like a great resource for probs. i am here today cause i am evaluating dkprov9 and like it so much better than the norton speeddisk that came in systemworks 2003. but there is one drive that just wont defrag well, no matter what i do in diskeeper, and i think i've done it all according to the interface and help files, even to the point of defragging over and over, which makes no difference. i was going to write executive support an email, but i much prefer getting help from real users like u all. here are the reports from diskeeper on the strange drive, which contains mostly my very big media files - that's what its used for. i am very sensitive about having my video files completely defragged, as they seem to perform better that way. thanks in advance for any suggestions!

    log from bootup defrag:

    Diskeeper(R) NTFS Boot-Time Defragmenter Version 8.0 Build 149a 20030811
    Copyright (c) 2003 Executive Software International, Inc.

    Keeping paging file...
    Folders -> MFT area...
    Minimizing MFT Fragments...
    Summary File Set To: C:\ILOG.TXT

    Data for NTFS volume I:
    =========================================
    Bytes per cluster = 4096
    Total clusters on volume = 23037202
    Total File Records = 7888

    Contiguous Uncompressed Folders Moved: .......................... 11
    Contiguous Uncompressed Files Moved: ............................ 44
    Non-resident Attributes Moved: .................................. 1
    Contiguous Compressed Files Moved: .............................. 1

    Diskeeper boot-time processing completed.

    log from regular defrag:

    Volume IonMedia (I:):
    Volume size = 89,989 MB
    Cluster size = 4 KB
    Used space = 62,835 MB
    Free space = 27,153 MB
    Percent free space = 30 %
    Defragmentation method = File Performance Defragmentation

    Fragmentation percentage
    Volume fragmentation = 38 %
    Data fragmentation = 54 %

    File fragmentation
    Total files = 3,449
    Average file size = 18,718 KB
    Total fragmented files = 8
    Total excess fragments = 55
    Average fragments per file = 1.01
    Files with performance loss = 0
    Paging file fragmentation
    Paging/Swap file size = 0 bytes
    Total fragments = 0

    Directory fragmentation
    Total directories = 1,010
    Fragmented directories = 0
    Excess directory fragments = 0

    Master File Table (MFT) fragmentation
    Total MFT size = 7,888 KB
    MFT records In Use = 4,627
    Percent MFT in use = 58 %
    Total MFT fragments = 2

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fragments File size Most fragmented files
    11 5,122 MB \Videos\Snipets\tinajumpTake2.avi
    6 2,780 MB \Videos\Trek\Video (finished)\trek_final.nrg [Partially Defragmented]
    4 2,151 MB \Videos\PoojaShow\poojashow.nrg
    12 5,342 MB \Videos\Trek\Video (finished)\Slides_shorter.avi
    4 2,342 MB \Videos\Snipets\MugarkotRide.avi
     
  5. Colemanguy

    Colemanguy MajorGeek

    If its an option copy everything to a different drive, and then format that drive then copy them back. That will insure a defragmented drive. Until you start moving stuff around again
     

MajorGeeks.Com Menu

Downloads All In One Tweaks \ Android \ Anti-Malware \ Anti-Virus \ Appearance \ Backup \ Browsers \ CD\DVD\Blu-Ray \ Covert Ops \ Drive Utilities \ Drivers \ Graphics \ Internet Tools \ Multimedia \ Networking \ Office Tools \ PC Games \ System Tools \ Mac/Apple/Ipad Downloads

Other News: Top Downloads \ News (Tech) \ Off Base (Other Websites News) \ Way Off Base (Offbeat Stories and Pics)

Social: Facebook \ YouTube \ Twitter \ Tumblr \ Pintrest \ RSS Feeds