Experiment's on Humans without Consent

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by ASUS, Jul 7, 2006.

  1. ASUS

    ASUS MajorGeek

    Anyone heard of Polyheme, Poly SFH-P (Manufacture of NorthField Labs, I think)
    It's a man made Experimental Blood approved by FDA for experiment on Trama patients, :eek: Without The Patients Knowledge:eek:
    Just seen a story on 20/20 about it Scary:eek:
    Seems in some major citys if your in accident or similar you might recieve some of this experimental product with your knowledge.
    People are dying & or having Heart attacks where as this product is the Prime suspect:eek:
    FDA started to do Interview with 20/20 that lasted about 30 seconds then they declined to comment.

    http://www.defrance.org/artman/publish/printer_1531.shtml

    The only way to Guarantee you wont get this Polyheme is to wear a special blue exclusion bracelet

    http://www.slhn-lehighvalley.org/body.cfm?id=768

    :eek: Here's List of some Hospital's participating or who had participated:eek:
    California
    UC San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California, 92103, United States; No longer recruiting

    Scripps Mercy, San Diego, California, 92103, United States; No longer recruiting

    Colorado
    Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States; Recruiting
    Jeffrey S Long, RRT 303-436-7906


    Delaware
    Christiana Hospital, Newark, Delaware, 19718, United States; Recruiting
    Christine Babenko, RN 302-733-4549


    Georgia
    Medical Center of Central Georgia, Macon, Georgia, 31201, United States; Recruiting
    Debra Kitchens, RN 478-633-1584


    Illinois
    Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States; Recruiting
    Marcia Halerz, RN, BSN, MBA 708-327-2457


    Indiana
    Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States; Recruiting
    Gretchen Huffman 317-287-3029


    Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States; Recruiting
    Rick Lowry 317-962-6144


    Kansas
    University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States; Recruiting
    Suzanne Porras, RN 913-588-0068


    Kentucky
    University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States; Recruiting
    Anna Rockich, PharmD 859-323-6346


    Michigan
    Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States; Recruiting
    Kathy Owensby, MS 313-577-5314


    Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States; Recruiting
    Kathy Owensby, MS 313-577-5314


    Minnesota
    The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States; Recruiting
    Kelly Sahs 507-272-2158


    New York
    Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, 12208, United States; Suspended

    North Carolina
    Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States; Recruiting
    Paula Sprague, RN 919-681-2406


    Ohio
    MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States; Suspended

    University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0769, United States; Recruiting
    Kay Vonderschmidt, NREMT-P 513-558-5786


    Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, 45409, United States; Recruiting
    Susan Mallett, MS, APN 937-208-5069


    Pennsylvania
    Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, United States; No longer recruiting

    St. Luke's Regional Resource Trauma Center, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States; Recruiting
    Christy Stehly, BS 610-954-6076


    Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States; Recruiting
    Theresa Novchich, RN, BSN, CCRC 717.531.4703


    Tennessee
    University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, 38163, United States; Recruiting
    Stephanie Panzer, RN 901-448-5714


    Johnson City Medical Center, Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604, United States; Suspended

    Texas
    Memorial-Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States; No longer recruiting

    University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, 78284, United States; Recruiting
    Janet McCarthy, RN 210-567-5724


    Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam, Houston, Texas, 78234-6315, United States; Recruiting
    Nancy C Molter, RN, MN, PhD 210-916-5690


    Utah
    University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States; Recruiting
    Lisa Reynolds, RN, BSN 801-585-0385


    LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143, United States; Recruiting
    Jolene Fox, RN 801-408-2295


    Virginia
    Sentara Norfolk Hospital, Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States; No longer recruiting

    Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, 23298-0454, United States; Recruiting
    Judy Katzen, MS 804-827-0283


    Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, 22066, United States; Suspended

    West Virginia
    West Virginia University/Jon Michael Moore Trauma Center, Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States; Recruiting
    Bill Manley, RN, CEN 304-598-4659

    More Information

    Study ID Numbers: RTBSE-11-(N)
    Last Updated: June 23, 2006
    Record first received: January 28, 2004
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00076648
    Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration
    ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2006-07-07
     
  2. TimW

    TimW MajorGeeks Administrator - Jedi Malware Expert Staff Member

    Was just on abc tonight ...been going on for a good while ....supposed to stop in a month or so ....no one knew!!!
     
  3. Lev

    Lev MajorGeek

    I'm relieved to not see Oregon on that list, having recently had major surgery myself. Really scary stuff......
     
  4. Natakel

    Natakel Guest

    Creepy stuff. I am not opposed to using experimental medical treatments if I should find myself facing certain death . . . but I do demand informed consent.

    I'm aghast.
     
  5. DavidGP

    DavidGP MajorGeeks Forum Administrator - Grand Pooh-Bah Staff Member

    Very scary stuff indeed, the UK has laws were the Doc's have to be upfront with experimental drugs and treatments so the patient is well aware of what they are getting into, also they have to sadly read some of the required literature in which some read like a small novel and if not read properly you could miss sections on adverse affects of said drug, but at least you are given the chance.. in this case scarely without patient consent, if a patient is brought into trauma unconsious then this subsitute IMO should not be administered but only used for consenting patients.

    I also would have serious doubts at the validity of the data that will come from this trial as trauma depts are often way to busy to fully fill in the research documents needed in trials, which is why this seems to be an uncontrolled trial and pretty much confirmed by this statment,

    Kinda falls on the side of they didnt have full results in the first place to publish.

    Nice lure to use unconcious unsuspecting gunineepigs ( patients ) into a cash making trial?
     
  6. G.T.

    G.T. R.I.P February 4, 2007. You will be missed.

    I smell some large lawsuits coming. While tramua centers often have to administer drugs/treatment without informed consent or approval, they are NOT allowed to use experimental un-approved drugs/treatments that way. Shame on them all, and on Northfield, which obviously was trying to do testing without the rigorous procedures needed for proper testing.
     
  7. Jerkyking

    Jerkyking Sergeant Major

    I seen this story on the news yesterday too. They tested it in our area. I had to say I was shocked to hear about it being done without consent. This stuff may actually work & be fine and eventually be the future... however I am against any testing done on humans without their knowledge or consent (but still won't wear a bracelet).
     
  8. Toni_1947

    Toni_1947 Command Sergeant Major

    I am not surprised, as all sorts of illegal testing has been going on for decades.
    We, in the U.S., have not been and may never be safe from the "Mad Scientists"
    ...and how much do we NOT KNOW?
    I've learned to live each day as though it were my last....because it might be.
    :(
     
  9. DavidGP

    DavidGP MajorGeeks Forum Administrator - Grand Pooh-Bah Staff Member

    Lots Toni, I have no doubt of that.... also alot depends on the actual doctor being upfront that a drug that maybe able to help your ills is actually experimental or not.


    This is the stages the UK trials go through http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/medical_notes/4872918.stm , the one I'm involved with has 2yrs left in which we are collecting data to submit finally to NICE with recomemndations if its viable or not, in the mean time 2 new drugs have emerged past Phase I and entering now Phase II with recruitment of patients who meet the criteria for the drug under guidelines for the same disease we research.
     
  10. star17

    star17 MajorGeek

    Some folks have fake faces, fake boobs, fake organs....why not fake blood?

    There are two professional field in which full disclosure & consent is a luxury: legal and medical.
     
  11. Kodo

    Kodo SNATCHSQUATCH

    you doofs.. it's all safe.. it's made from the blood of Blonde people :D
    //end sarcasm
     
  12. Just Playin

    Just Playin MajorGeek

    This reminds me of the Prozac/suicide link story.
     
  13. slider

    slider Major Wise-***

    I agree 100%. This is a totally unacceptable testing methodology, both ethically and medically speaking.

    From the article :
    While Northfield says PolyHeme could be useful in rural ambulances, battlefields and other settings where real blood is out of reach for hours, it hasn't conducted a large-scale test focusing solely on that notion. It says assembling patients for such a trial would be too difficult and time-consuming. " We all recognize that doing the [trauma] trial in an urban setting was not ideal, but this was the only way to get the trial done, " says a Northfield spokeswoman.


    Drug / Medical device testing is ALWAYS difficult and time consuming. If it is not, you are doing it wrong. I cannot believe that the company would release such a statement, and not recognize its implications - " it's to much trouble to do it correctly". And the payment of $10,000 per patient is much in excess of the money needed to document the results. They were simply trying to buy the physicians good will.

    Outrageous. The company should be disbanded, and the decision makers at the company barred from any kind of medical practice, treatment, manufacturing. And the FDA decision makers who allowed this to go forward should be removed from the FDA.
     

MajorGeeks.Com Menu

Downloads All In One Tweaks \ Android \ Anti-Malware \ Anti-Virus \ Appearance \ Backup \ Browsers \ CD\DVD\Blu-Ray \ Covert Ops \ Drive Utilities \ Drivers \ Graphics \ Internet Tools \ Multimedia \ Networking \ Office Tools \ PC Games \ System Tools \ Mac/Apple/Ipad Downloads

Other News: Top Downloads \ News (Tech) \ Off Base (Other Websites News) \ Way Off Base (Offbeat Stories and Pics)

Social: Facebook \ YouTube \ Twitter \ Tumblr \ Pintrest \ RSS Feeds