Monty Python And The Holy Grail Watch Free Youtube.

I lost 200 on the first at flemington, still came out 1000 up at the end of the day!
Your quoting the duds, what about the winners?
Ok, i will go find them for you seeing your on a biased side.

Star Wars : The last Jedi
highest domestic grossing movie of all-time with $936M and third highest worldwide with $2.07 billion.
Unaffected by YT or burning a copy for my neighbour

Thor: Ragnarok
Ragnarok‘s massive No. 1 $122.7M opening weekend.
posted a record high for the trilogy with a domestic total of $315M, and a global take of $853.5M.
Would have got more if it didnt have Hemsworth. lol

What else you got Tim?

 

Starving? No. But they (we) lose millions of dollars of income overall every year due to piracy and illegal file sharing.

https://creativefuture.org/why-this-matters/whats-the-problem/

 

You're quoting gross. We're talking net. There's kind of a huge difference. Nobody is saying movies don't make money... if they didn't, no one would continue to make movies. You specifically asked for proof backing up my hypothetical movie, and Tim provided you with several examples.

 

No proof file sharing contributes to losses......its all hot wind from those that oppose it
Did you know tibbs that your contributing to a website that actually supplies and promotes client software for sharing a book?
Ooops sorry, stealing, and will eat your pet cat?

http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/bittorrent.html

http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/torrentrover.html

http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/utorrent.html

Your all a bunch of hypocrites, nothing else~!

 

Huh. Who knew that all file sharing, regardless of content, was illegal?

 

I could ask the same of you?

Thats a fact and its here to stay, what do we do?
Shut down or censor the internet to appease the movie industry? Or do we suck it up and move on because we know its here to stay?

 

Aaahhh, nothing like some healthy debate to starve the boredom hey guys?

Getting back in my box now

Edit: [whats that lump under my doona? Crap, its the dvd i had my mates copy for me, Im gonna take it straight back and tell them how naughty they are]

 

If someone was stealing from you, would you just "suck it up and move on"? Or would you do something to prevent it?

 

Good point tibbs......but i beg the answer, what do we do to stop it?
I can put screens up on my windows, and install CCTV, but what about the fact that all our computers are connected together?

Are we giving more ammo to the Feds to censor us?
Is this what we want?
I think terrorism is a way better excuse to the cause of internet censorship.
Lets have them read our emails, tag our browsing habits, force our ISP's to hand over IP's, tell them which bank we funded the account from etc etc.
Its already happening.

 

Lol....I knew you would do that you google abuser you!

Where's the love?

Edit: I just wanted to stick up for Wile cause i thought he made a good point, and then it rained down on me now - Phil Collins

 

You live under the Magic Faraway tree Tim, dont underestimate the crews behind these sites.
Its a cat n mouse game, and the mouse usually wins.
You should know that, your a malware fighter.

Here you go, they have been shut/attacked/ DoSS'd /attempts to censor / been put in jail sharing food with Snowden, yet they still remain
https://thepiratebay.org/

And i can get client software right here to connect......

Now you have upset me with your ignorance!

 

Well, for starters, websites like YouTube remove copyright-protected content such as Monty Python and the Holy Grail when posted in its entirety to stream without licensing.

 

Hehe, fair enough!

 

Lol....Believe nothing of what your read, and only half of what you see!

Did you click my link?
Works for me

 

Read my posts Tim!
Sorry if i upset you mate but the truth is the truth......we all cann Trump for hiding behind it!

They run proxies to served mirrors, its far from a native domain
https://piratebay-proxylist.com/

Dont get me wrong, I dont support piracy in anyway, but the facts are it remains!

 

First of all i love tibbs, she is a woman who is prepared to stand up for what she believes in, I respect that!
Admit though, you would be bored to tears over in the malware forum without the likes of piratebay!
But yes your right, Im sorry tibbsy, big hugs from me!

 

Hey, we got ol' Wile E's thread moving though didnt we?

 

Soon to be released...
"Monty Python and the Holy Debate".
Read for free on MajorGeeks!

 

This entire thread is surreal.

Making a copy of a movie you purchased, and posting that copy on YouTube, does not fall under the legal definition of stealing. In order to steal from someone, you need to actually deprive that person of a physical object, which movie piracy does not do. Making a copy of a movie you purchased, and posting that copy on YouTube, is copyright infringement.

Using the right label matters, just like robbing someone is different from assaulting them, and using the correct term for what happened when someone shoved you and took your purse, matters. (In a possibly futile attempt to prevent emotional verbal attacks I will state very firmly that both robbery and assault are WRONG. Just like copyright infringement is wrong.)

While I have a strong opinion on this entire issue, and agree with one side more than the other, I can honestly say that takes a backseat to my strong desire to for once in my online life see someone use the correct legal term for the crime you are discussing.

 

Intellectual property theft is not the same as copyright infringement. And I would be very careful about trusting information from any site that claims that "intellectual property theft costs U.S. businesses billions of dollars a year and robs the nation of jobs and tax revenues", and then conveniently forgets to present any data to back up that claim. That's far too similar to the music industry's claim that every illegal download equals a lost sale, and we all know that's flat out wrong, and nothing but propaganda.

Copyright infringement could be considered a form of intellectual property theft, if you are willing to keep your definitions vague and not care too much about the details. However, the moment you try to claim that someone who is downloading a movie of TV show is stealing from whoever created it, you're sliding off down a very slippery slope of factually incorrect statements, and falsehoods.

Viewing a Monty Python movie uploaded to YouTube by someone other than Monty Python, is not theft of intellectual property. Neither is downloading the latest version of Game of Thrones from a torrent for your own viewing pleasure, and never sharing your copy with anyone. In fact, in most countries neither of those actions are even illegal. But when you state that they are, you not only confuse the issue at hand, you make it impossible to have a productive conversation about the actual problem, that can lead to positive results. It's the online piracy version of joining the #MeToo movement because a man shoved me out of the way in an airport once. It wasn't a sexual assault, and I should not refer to it as one.

 

I prefer the term, 'sharing', not theft......we paid for it, we can share it with who we want, and do whatever the hell we like with it.

Robbing companies of their ideas, inventions and creative expressions?????

..........its their choice to make it public, because they want to be paid money for it.
If its so valuable and sensitive, keep it private and protect it.
If I pay for it, they have got their wish, been paid, then this transfers the legal ownership of the object to me doesnt it?

If I buy a car, its mine.....not the companies who built it!
And I can lend it to my neighbor to drive down the shop if I so desire.

 

These associations must start learning to work with it, rather than against it.
Utilize it for all the benefits its worth to them.

My point last night was that while i might not agree, its here to stay....like it or not!
Kinda like the war on drugs, if they fight it, they will continue to lose.
How many times do you hit your thumb with a hammer before you decide, hang-on, this hurts!

 

Both sides make valid points and I sympathize with both.

My freedom is my biggest asset and no-one will take that away.
Mimsy is right however,
Its all just propaganda brought on by the sheer greed of corporates that think they have the right to socially engineer me about what i can, and cant do with whats in my possession.
To hell with em!

 

It goes on everywhere today.
Your ISP tracks and logs your browsing habits and then onsells this information to the highest bidders.
All without your permission.

Your browsing habits are your own creative design are they not?
This is also theft of your intellectual data under your interpretation of this matter.

 

It is also, no disrespect to you, why this seems to be turning into a very emotional conversation.

Taking my wedding photos to Walmart and making copies for my own use instead of paying a professional photographer five times as much, strikes me as economical, more than anything else. If the photographer doesn't want me to do that, they should have asked me to sign a legally binding contract that prevents me from doing so, before handing over the pictures. (This would be the equivalent of the T&Cs of most software and PC games, btw.) I am of course still going to be able to make pictures at Walmart if I want to, but now the photographer can sue me if I do it.

And I'm talking completely in an abstract hypothetical, while you're talking about something that destroyed an important part of your life. Let's keep it abstract. It's easier to remain civil if we do.

And technically, if someone downloads a song from a file share site, without paying the artist, they're not actually committing intellectual property theft. The person that made the song available for download did. The person downloading is grabbing a file from a public forum on the internet and may not even know it's not supposed to be there - though that is admittedly rare. However, whether they realize it or not, the downloader in this scenario is guilty of copyright infringement, which also is a crime. Just a different one than intellectual property theft.

@Replicator
Please stop claiming that you and I agree with each other on this issue. We don't. You do not actually own the digital copy of a movie you bought on Amazon Prime, anymore than you own the games you bought on Steam. Read up on licensing of digital entertainment media and streaming, including eBooks and library books, and make sure you understand how things work before you rejoin the debate. Start by gaining a better understanding of what intellectual property actually is.

 

In that case, whoever assisted them at Walmart was even more at fault.

Not in the least. I was trying to prevent it from getting to that point.,and it's entirely possible that was an overreaction on my part.

I feel like I would be remiss if I didn't mention that a large reason for why sales of music have gone down, is the number of legal alternatives to making purchases. A small monthly fee to Spotify gives you access to almost all the music in the world, as long as you have an internet connection. If you have that, and Amazon Prime Music as a back-up option, a lot of music lovers will settle for that and just not make individual purchases anymore. Why bother, when I can have an entire music library on my smartphone, via the cloud? Without paying $10 per album, or without even needing to buy a full album if I don't want to? With any music I want at my fingertips, thanks to the search field?

RIAA are losing revenue because they were slow to adapt to this new reality - what they should have done when they discovered Napster was not to shut it down, but to provide a legal, and better, alternative.... but they didn't do that. They tried to stop the digital evolution of music, instead of embracing it, and they paid the price. They still are.

Blockbuster was replaced by online streaming largely because no one needed their services anymore. Record stores are unlikely to go that way... but sales of CDs might. And when that happens, everyone who has paid attention will have seen it coming.

 

One of the biggest challenges facing the movie/music industry isn’t the technology itself, but rather the resulting mindset of the listeners/watchers, particularly towards the value of the content itself.

No one is really paying attention to the end point user......the digital aged, and internet savvy consumer!

If we can access it we will, so until you can stop that Tim, all your whinging and 'do-gooder' googling will fall on deaf ears.
Its a fact.

Have you ever had a parking or speeding ticket?......well guess what?, your a law breaker too!

 

Who do we listen too?